A new 100 – the time for romance

BlogPost100I just looked at my blog stats and realized I’ve already published over 100 blog posts. I should’ve celebrated the #100, but sadly, it’s passed unnoticed. I still want to do a special post for the occasion. When I started the blog, I wasn’t even sure I have it in me to put my thoughts out there, but I do. Who would’ve guessed?

For this centennial post, I want to talk about the new story I’m writing. The idea came to me recently, and I think it would be a new genre and a new length for me – a departure on all counts. I’m writing a Regency romance in a novella format, taking place at Christmas. I have never written anything like it before, don’t even know the markets for such stories.

Would there be magic, as in the majority of my stories? I’m not sure. Most of the plot-line is already mapped, except for the resolution of the main conflict. If magic will make its appearance in this tale, it would be in the end. It’s not needed anywhere else.

Cupid by Carle van Loo

Although I don’t know yet how the heroes would handle their predicament that prevents their happily-ever-after, I do know I will find out soon. I have another problem with the story though. I don’t know how to write smut. Should I? Could it be a clean romance without lust or intercourse?

It seems that nowadays, any story in the romance genre requires a certain percentage of pages dedicated to dirty scenes. I’ve never written such scenes before and although as a reader, I enjoy a good romance, I always skim steamy sex in my reading. For me, those scenes are boring. They stop the action, while the author (any author) concentrates on silky thighs, buds of feminine ecstasy, and explosive climaxes. I suppose I could fake the thing but should I? Maybe instead I should look for a collaborator to write a hot and spicy bonking act for my characters? Short and salacious, anyone? Your name would be in the byline, of course, alongside mine.

I also have another quandary: I can’t come up with a good name for my female protagonist. I’ve tried several placeholders, but so far, no name really fits my heroine. She is twenty-four. She has brown hair and hazel eyes. She is average in build and pretty but not beautiful. No dowry and no rich relatives to take care of her, while she cares for her two younger sisters. There is also an entailed estate involved and a dashing officer, resigned from the army after being severely wounded. All the requisites of a solid Regency spin, plus some surprising twist to make it original (I hope).

Perhaps someone would suggest a good Regency name.

This entry was posted in Olga Godim, Writing and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to A new 100 – the time for romance

  1. Widdershins says:

    Romances can be all ‘hot and bothered’ and if you’re not comfortable going any further than a certain point, then you close the bedroom door.

    I don’t know if it’s Regency, but I’ve always been fond of, Isabel, or Isabella. (but it’s probably been used to death!) 🙂

  2. dolorah says:

    I love writing smut 🙂 But, if you usually don’t have it in your books, really there is no requirement to start now. I’ve read some well written, steamy romance with no smut. And if the magic only enters the book at the very end, it probably is not needed at all. Regency romance has its own dedicated audience. As for names, I’d suggest researching common (or uncommon) names from the era and area you intend to set the sstory. Or and old English/Irish name with a meaning that suits her personality. That is how I find a lot of my character names.

    Have fun writing this story. Sounds like you have an excellent start.

  3. derrolyn says:

    I love to write romance but usually “fade to black” with the more mechanical details in the sex scenes. The tension is all in the build-up and the surrender anyway, LOL.

    Check this page out for a list of names : http://bryndonovan.com/2014/12/08/name-those-regency-era-characters/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s